SportsProf

(Hopefully) good sports essays and observations for good sports by a guy who tries (and can sometimes fail) to be a good sport.

Name:

Not much to tell.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, January 13, 2017

Mike & Mike to Split Up?

That would be something.


About 15 years ago I had a long commute, and I found a new ESPN radio show on morning drive time.  I had heard of Mike Golic, who was perhaps the most anonymous defensive lineman for Buddy Ryan's great defenses in Philadelphia.  You would have been anonymous too if the other three linemen were named Reggie White, Jerome Brown and Clyde Simmons.  I hadn't heard of Mike Greenberg, but he impressed me immediately.  He was part show host, part fan and part sports nerd, but with the right type of ego.  Not the type of "I am in love with myself ego" that some others on ESPN have, but the type that says "I know my stuff and am determined to be fair and get it right."  Together, Greenberg, trained as a journalist, and Golic, a well-informed, homework-doing former athlete, showed promise. 


I went home and told my wife that I had found a wonderful show, and that these two would be stars. 


I was right.


Back then, as they were in formation, the show was chock full of information as ads were fewer and farther between than they are now, as the show seems to have so many adds as to dilute the message and the content.  But that's business, and that's a measure of their success. 


What made and makes them so appealing is that they provide information and not just opinions, and they avoid the rants and outsized personalities that can populate and at times plague sports talk radio in any city.  I like to spend my free time getting informed, relaxed and at times amused.  Hearing a drive-time talk show host call his callers idiots frequently (as one so-called luminary in Philadelphia did for a while) is not appealing.  That behavior is not amusing; it is unkind. 


This article offers up the possibility that Mike Greenberg will become the centerpiece of a newly formatted morning Sports Center show.  He certainly deserves that, as for years I had thought that, like Robin Roberts, his talents would have translated to a morning news show, such as "Today" or "Good Morning America."  Mike Golic's future is unclear.  He is a talent, but he and Greenberg have a unique chemistry that I am not sure that any replacement host can replicate.  Trey Wingo has been stellar at ESPN for years, but if he were to replace Mike Greenberg, the comparisons would be inevitable, and I think he would be, rightly or wrongly, on the losing side of them. 


I hope that ESPN finds a good slot for Mike Golic, Sr., who is knowledgeable and lovable.  Mike Golic, Jr.'s lack of success making an NFL team has turned out to be a boost for his media career and for ESPN.  The latter has unearthed a solid talent in his very formative journalistic years.  Mike Jr. is smart and reasonably polished for a young show host.  I am less certain whether pairing him with his father is a good idea.  They both have so much in common that I am less certain whether the show will offer significantly varying perspectives.  This is a high-class problem; both are good.


I suppose that many good runs have to come to an end.  Some might argue that they have run their course; others might argue that this is the evolution of the sports media business.  The latter has to be more accurate in this case.  Mike & Mike is an excellent show, and I wish both Mikes nothing but the best.  They have enriched their audiences for a long run.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home